Flavors of “unknown”

In The End of Alchemy, former Governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King distinguishes between two kinds of unknowns concerning the future:

In coming to terms with an unknowable future, it is helpful to use the distinction between risk and uncertainty introduced in 1921 by the American economist Frank Knight. Risk concerns events, like your house catching fire, where it is possible to define precisely the nature of the future outcome and to assign a probability to the occurrence of that event based on past experience. […] Uncertainty, by contrast, concerns events where it is not possible to define, or even imagine, all possible future outcomes, and to which probabilities cannot therefore be assigned.

Distinguishing between risk and uncertainty is crucial …

  • Because we systematically neglect thinking about uncertainty, and …
  • Because our neglect of uncertainty steers us towards “optimizing” rather than “coping”, to the detriment of our futures.

Read More »

Book Review: Writing to Learn by William Zinsser

I wrote this book to try to ease two fears that American education seems to inflict on all of us in some form. One is the fear of writing. Most people have to do some kind of writing just to get through the day – a memo, a report, a letter – and would almost rather die than do it. The other is the fear of subjects we don’t think we have an aptitude for. Students with a bent for the humanities are terrified of science and mathematics, and students with an aptitude for science and mathematics are terrified of the humanities – all those subjects like English and philosophy and the arts that can’t be pinned down with numbers or formulas. I now think that these fears are largely unnecessary burdens to lug through life.

WritingToLearnCoverThat’s how William Zinsser – writer, journalist, teacher, and former editor of the Book-of-the-Month Club – begins Writing to Learn. Part autobiography, part writing guide, and part inventory of exemplary writing from fields not renowned for their engaging prose (e.g. chemistry, mathematics, music), the book is – as you might imagine – well written. The focus is non-fiction, or as he calls it, “explanatory writing: writing that transmits existing information or ideas,” although parts of the book are relevant to fiction writing as well.

Read More »

Book Review: The Relativity of Wrong by Isaac Asimov

isaac_asimov

Often enough it’s the book itself that draws us in, but sometimes it’s the author.

Isaac Asimov was an intellectual force of nature, a truly rare event. He was extraordinarily prolific, pumping out over 500 fiction and nonfiction books on a huge range of topics. As someone who is familiar with just how much effort it takes to put together a decent book-length manuscript, I am truly in awe. It’s also mind-boggling to think that this single man wrote more books than many people read in a lifetime. And he wasn’t putting out drivel either – he was widely considered one of or perhaps the best science fiction writer of his day, and his Foundation series earned him the prestigious Hugo Award for “Best All-Time Series” – beating, among others, The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien!Read More »